tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5762360188700065101.post3414480327338165887..comments2023-10-30T03:53:20.405-04:00Comments on EN 170 Summer 2009: Introduction to Literary Study: Assignment #1 Eng 170WUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5762360188700065101.post-8000161008006670542009-07-06T06:31:16.317-04:002009-07-06T06:31:16.317-04:00Actually, you can find it here:
http://www.newyor...Actually, you can find it here:<br /><br />http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/07/23/070723fa_fact_denbyS Henklehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10893192932580925482noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5762360188700065101.post-68365610784355276432009-07-06T06:30:39.462-04:002009-07-06T06:30:39.462-04:00Interesting, and the Apatow movies make for a grea...Interesting, and the Apatow movies make for a great subject. Be sure to get into and then stick to your argument--the first paragraph is very general and the second half of the second paragraph doesn't clarify why it's talking about ideological concerns, and so it comes off sounding like broad statements about how most people feel about marijuana legalization. The overall point that such a film could only be made today is a good one, though--would have been great to stick to just that point throughout. Also, if you're interested in the subject, there was a pretty good article about these films (and how they might be a new genre). I can't copy and paste links here, so email me if you're interested, or google 'denby on apatow' and you'll see it.S Henklehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10893192932580925482noreply@blogger.com